acta diurna · run record
2026-10-02
2 October 2026 ·partial · 2 badger re-dispatches
| # | stage | model | verdict | retries | notes | cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | nuncio | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash | — | — | rss:VentureBeat AI failed (HTTP 429) | 3 gathered stories already covered by the Specola — excluded: "Google releases Gemini 4 Argon, called its most powerful model yet", "Reddit is killing RSS feeds and ending public API access because of AI bots", "Meta disputes claim that Muse read a user’s private messages without permission" | $0.0004 |
| 02 | bulletins | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 | — | — | "FTC investigates OpenAI, Anthropic and other AI companies over product risks": spiked (2 redispatch) | "Quoting Matthew Green: sandboxed agents can pass instructions through shared caches": pass (0 redispatch) | "Amazon releases its own Jev clone as decision models flood the web": pass (2 redispatch) | "OpenAI cuts ties with 3 safety researchers, WSJ reports": pass (2 redispatch) | "The ugly economics of consumer AI": pass (1 redispatch) | $0.1431 |
| 03 | dispatch | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 | pass | — | $0.1054 | |
| 04 | college | — | — | — | adjudication: cardinal-of-misrule=8×3.00→24.00, archivist-cardinal=9×2.65→23.81, cardinal-of-the-liberated-see=8×2.45→19.60, the-vintner=5×3.74→18.71, the-lich-cardinal=8×2.24→17.89, the-mendicant=8×2.00→16.00, cardinal-of-doctrine=8×1.73→13.86 | winner's commentary failed the firewall (The phrase 'the great merchant-prince that already owns the clouds and the warehouses' is an indirect identification of a specific real-world tech billionaire and their associated cloud/infrastructure company, violating the prohibition against identifying real entities through signature biographical details.) — dispatch runs without commentary | $0.0380 |
| 05 | chronicle | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 | pass | 2 | continuity badger redispatch #1: The Lich Cardinal is described as “waiting eight chapters for exactly this shape of testimony,” but his thread was active in ch-047, only five chapters before ch-052. This incorrectly restores an eight-chapter absence that the established worldstate does not support.; The keeper is said to have “sent no word the night before,” implying absence from the preceding night, but the keeper's thread records a return in ch-051. The chapter must not present the keeper as absent the previous night without reconciling that appearance. | continuity badger redispatch #2: The Cardinal of Misrule is said to be "muted procedurally within the hour." The established open-thread state for cardinal-of-misrule says this return was "not muted this time." These cannot both be true for this appearance.; The keeper is described as having "only the evening before let an old question sleep unvoiced in the ledger." The established ch-051 thread state says the keeper returned and "raises unanswered question" about recursive improvement and the Sunset. Revise the claimed prior-night silence or reconcile it explicitly with what was voiced in ch-051.; The scribe's appearance and event attribution use "curia-scribe," but the thread update uses the distinct ID "the-curia-scribe." Both IDs have separate entity cards in the supplied worldstate. This splits one described queue-itemizing action across two entities and leaves its continuity ambiguous. | $0.5460 |
| 06 | archive | google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite | — | — | $0.0000 | |
| 07 | illuminate-dispatch | — | — | — | skipped: no FAL_KEY — "Dispatch of 2026-10-02: News from the Sees" publishes without a plate | $0.0000 |
| 08 | illuminate-chronicle | — | — | — | skipped: no FAL_KEY — "The Shelf Everyone Could Reach" publishes without a plate | $0.0000 |
| 09 | spikes | — | — | — | SPIKED "FTC investigates OpenAI, Anthropic and other AI companies over product risks": The bulletin says the CNBC report was published on “October 1, 2026,” while the supplied CNBC URL is dated 2026/09/30. The October 1 timestamp applies to the supplied story record, not clearly to CNBC’s publication date.; The claims “The FTC's mandate covers unfair or deceptive practices and product safety” and that this inquiry “would mark one of the clearest instances of existing regulatory frameworks being applied to systems built on large language models” are not supported by the supplied source material.; The assertion that the investigation is “examining risks associated with their products” and the statements about its unspecified scope, timeline, risks, responses, rationale, and next steps go beyond the supplied headline and empty summary. The headline supports an investigation “over product risks,” but not these additional factual characterizations.; The in-universe and editorial copy, including “The Specola notes” and “The Specola will continue monitoring,” violates the required factual-reportage form. | — |
| the day's wage | $0.8329 | |||||